-
Difference between “Further Investigation” and “Re-investigation” 51. There is no doubt that “further investigation” and “re-investigation” stand altogether on a different footing. In Ramchandran v. R. Udhayakumar and Others reported in (2008) 5 SCC 413, this Court has explained the fine distinction between the two relying on its earlier decision in K. Chandrasekhar v. State…
-
Reference may also be placed on the decision in Pooja Pal v. Union of India and Others reported in (2016) 3 SCC 135, where the fundamental rights enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution of India were discussed in the context of “speedy trial” juxtaposed to “fair trial” in the following manner: “83. A “speedy…
-
The Supreme Court of India in Paramjeet Batra v. State of Uttarakhand & Ors., (2013) 11 SCC 673 observed as follows- 7. While exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code the High Court has to be cautious. This power is to be used sparingly and only for the purpose of preventing abuse of…
-
Whether proceedings under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act 2007 can be used to decide title disputes? Recently, vide judgement dated 14th October, 2022 in Pawan Kumar and Anr. v. Divisional Commissioner Department of Revenue, Govt of Delhi and Others in LPA 525/2022, the Delhi High Court held as under: “9.…
-
Relying on H. Venkatachala Iyengar v. B.N. Thimmajamma, 1959 Supp (1) SCR 426 (3Judge Bench), Bhagwan Kaur v. Kartar Kaur, (1994) 5 SCC 135 (3Judge Bench), Janki Narayan Bhoir v. Narayan Namdeo Kadam, (2003) 2 SCC 91(2Judge Bench) Yumnam Ongbi Tampha Ibema Devi v. Yumnam Joykumar Singh, (2009) 4 SCC 780 (3Judge Bench) and Shivakumar…
-
In view of the above and for the reasons stated above, our final conclusions on the principal/core issue, whether the High Court would be justified in passing an interim order of stay of investigation and/or “no coercive steps to be adopted”, during the pendency of the quashing petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C and/or under Article…
-
1. What are Cross Cases or Cross FIRs? Cross cases or Cross FIRs refer to situations where two parties file separate First Information Reports (FIRs) in response to an incident, each accusing the other of a crime. This typically happens when both parties involved in an altercation or dispute accuse each other of wrongdoing, leading…
Popular Posts
- Supreme Court on Fraud and Deceit – Judgments
- Maintenance of Parents – Section 125 CrPC – Judgments
- Difference between Sec 125 CrPC and Senior Citizens Act
- Who is a Settlor in a Trust? – Role & Significance
- Supreme Court on Delay in lodging FIR / Complaint
- Plastic Ban – Constitutional Obligation
- Ex parte Injunction – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Senior Citizens Act – Maintenance & Welfare of Parents
- Maintenance Tribunals (Delhi) – Senior Citizens Act
- SC on Unreasonable Delay in Pronouncement of Judgment
- Supreme Court on Concealment of Material Facts
- What is a Will? – Essentials of a Valid Will
- Registration of FIR – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Appeal against Eviction Order – Senior Citizens Act
- What is Doctrine of Merger?
- Abbreviations used in Courts
- Daughter-in-Law’s Right To Reside – Senior Citizens Act
- Supreme Court on Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Cases
- SC on Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta
- Object and Purpose of Lodging FIR – Section 154 CrPC
- SC issues 12 Directions for Speedy Trial of Civil Cases
- Supreme Court on Principles Regarding the Plea of Alibi
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
Search the website
Law Quotes
Latest Posts
- Justice Krishna Iyer on Road Accident Claims – MACT Cases
- Supreme Court on Stray Dogs Menace – Judgment
- Beggars’ Homes – Supreme Court Directions
- Misuse of Adjournments: Supreme Court Judgments
- Scope of Section 151 CPC: Supreme Court Judgments
- Presumption of Innocence is a Human Right
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The National Green Tribunal Act, 2009
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- Role and Duties of an Advocate: Supreme Court Judgments
- Justice Felix Frankfurter – Quotes
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act, 2018
- When No Cause of Action: SC Judgment (Justice Krishna Iyer)
- Montesquieu – Quotes
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Statement of Objects and Reasons – The General Clauses Act, 1897