-
“19. In the matter of appreciation of evidence of witnesses, it is not the number of witnesses but quality of their evidence which is important, as there is no requirement under the Law of Evidence that any particular number of witnesses is to be examined to prove/disprove a fact. It is a time-honoured principle that…
-
“18. Keeping in view the aforesaid position of law, the testimony of PW 1 has to be appreciated. He has admitted his signature in the FIR but has given the excuse that it was taken on a blank paper. The same could have been clarified by the investigating officer, but for some reason, the investigating…
-
“51. It is necessary, though painful, to note that PW 7 was examined-in-chief on 30-9-1999 and was cross-examined on 25-5-2001, almost after 1 year and 8 months. The delay in said cross-examination, as we have stated earlier had given enough time for prevarication due to many a reason. A fair trial is to be fair…
-
“81. It is settled legal proposition that: “6. … the evidence of a prosecution witness cannot be rejected in toto merely because the prosecution chose to treat him as hostile and cross-examined him. The evidence of such witnesses cannot be treated as effaced or washed off the record altogether but the same can be accepted…
-
“In view of these considerations, we have no hesitation in holding that the contention that in a murder case, the court should insist upon plurality of witnesses, is much too broadly stated. Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act has categorically laid it down that “no particular number of witnesses shall in any case, be…
-
Fraud like any other charge of a criminal offence whether made in civil or criminal proceedings, must be established beyond reasonable doubt. A finding as to fraud cannot be based on suspicion and conjecture. Supreme CourtSvenska Handelsbanken vs Indian Charge Chrome (Dayal, J.) 1994 AIR 626, 1994 SCC (1) 502 However suspicious may be the…
-
According to the Mitakshara School of Hindu Law all the property of a Hindu joint family is held in collective ownership by all the coparceners in a quasi-corporate capacity. The textual authority of the Mitakshara lays down in express terms that the joint family property is held in trust for the joint family members then…
Popular Posts
- Supreme Court on Fraud and Deceit – Judgments
- Maintenance of Parents – Section 125 CrPC – Judgments
- Difference between Sec 125 CrPC and Senior Citizens Act
- Who is a Settlor in a Trust? – Role & Significance
- Supreme Court on Delay in lodging FIR / Complaint
- Plastic Ban – Constitutional Obligation
- Ex parte Injunction – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Senior Citizens Act – Maintenance & Welfare of Parents
- Maintenance Tribunals (Delhi) – Senior Citizens Act
- SC on Unreasonable Delay in Pronouncement of Judgment
- Supreme Court on Concealment of Material Facts
- What is a Will? – Essentials of a Valid Will
- Registration of FIR – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Appeal against Eviction Order – Senior Citizens Act
- What is Doctrine of Merger?
- Abbreviations used in Courts
- Daughter-in-Law’s Right To Reside – Senior Citizens Act
- Supreme Court on Honourable Acquittal in Criminal Cases
- SC on Difference Between Ratio Decidendi and Obiter Dicta
- Object and Purpose of Lodging FIR – Section 154 CrPC
- SC issues 12 Directions for Speedy Trial of Civil Cases
- Supreme Court on Principles Regarding the Plea of Alibi
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
Search the website
Law Quotes
Latest Posts
- Anticipatory Bail in Matrimonial Cases (Sec 438 CrPC): Supreme Court Judgments
- False Affidavit: Supreme Court Judgments
- Child Custody & Fraud: Supreme Court Judgments
- Perjury: Encyclopedia of Crime and Justice
- What are Doctrines in Law?
- Supreme Court on Contractual Liability and Imprisonment of Debtor
- Justice Krishna Iyer on Bail or Jail
- Nani Palkhivala – Quotes
- Justice Sandra Day O’Connor – Quotes
- Grounds for Invalidation of Law – Judicial Review
- Justice Sonia Sotomayor – Quotes
- Custody in Section 170 CrPC – Interpretation
- Human Liberty and Section 482 CrPC
- Grant of Bail – Supreme Court Guidelines
- Fali S. Nariman – Quotes